Abhishek Ghosh
2018-08-14 11:24:40 UTC
Web Push Notifications on Chrome for Android have a default action that
opens up the "Site Settings" panel that then has sections for
"Notifications", "Sound" and so on, with a "CLEAR & RESET" button below
which is the primary call-to-action on the page and immediately catches a
user's attention.
Why does the notification action take the user to Site Settings and not the
Notification Settings directly, since that whole option exists in itself?
- If someone wanted to change a website's notification settings, they
should be expected to be taken to this option instead rather than having to
make one more click.
- On the other side, the current behaviour may be quite dangerous. Users
who are not very tech savvy may not understand that tapping on the "CLEAR &
RESET" button (first thing they notice) would remove *every* preference
they have put on the website that includes cookies (their logged in state),
local storage data, permissions, audio/video preferences, and so on. They
will mistakenly lose everything. Not to mention the pain this causes for a
website owner since all the recognition context or trust/permissions they
have worked hard to establish with that user over some time will be
eradicated in a second.
I believe we should be more careful to not expose all the general &
powerful site/browser preferences eradication settings all together at once
this openly. I know that a confirmation is asked that all data including
cookies would be reset, but I don't think most people who are not very tech
savvy users, either read it or understand it properly; or are even looking
to do when they tapped on the "settings" action from the web
notification... A lot of people who are general web users don't even
understand what a cookie means, neither should we have to expect them to -
they could be people who have been introduced to the web relatively
recently (...imagine all the new people coming to internet every day in
countries like India who are still learning to properly use their
smartphones and the browser...) They may have subscribed to web push,
didn't like it, and just wanted to turn that particular thing off, but
instead the browser cleared off all data, including cookies, so now they
have to log in again and be asked for preferences again. That's a lot of
website usage friction that could be caused by a mistake!
Thoughts/opinions?
- Abhishek
opens up the "Site Settings" panel that then has sections for
"Notifications", "Sound" and so on, with a "CLEAR & RESET" button below
which is the primary call-to-action on the page and immediately catches a
user's attention.
Why does the notification action take the user to Site Settings and not the
Notification Settings directly, since that whole option exists in itself?
- If someone wanted to change a website's notification settings, they
should be expected to be taken to this option instead rather than having to
make one more click.
- On the other side, the current behaviour may be quite dangerous. Users
who are not very tech savvy may not understand that tapping on the "CLEAR &
RESET" button (first thing they notice) would remove *every* preference
they have put on the website that includes cookies (their logged in state),
local storage data, permissions, audio/video preferences, and so on. They
will mistakenly lose everything. Not to mention the pain this causes for a
website owner since all the recognition context or trust/permissions they
have worked hard to establish with that user over some time will be
eradicated in a second.
I believe we should be more careful to not expose all the general &
powerful site/browser preferences eradication settings all together at once
this openly. I know that a confirmation is asked that all data including
cookies would be reset, but I don't think most people who are not very tech
savvy users, either read it or understand it properly; or are even looking
to do when they tapped on the "settings" action from the web
notification... A lot of people who are general web users don't even
understand what a cookie means, neither should we have to expect them to -
they could be people who have been introduced to the web relatively
recently (...imagine all the new people coming to internet every day in
countries like India who are still learning to properly use their
smartphones and the browser...) They may have subscribed to web push,
didn't like it, and just wanted to turn that particular thing off, but
instead the browser cleared off all data, including cookies, so now they
have to log in again and be asked for preferences again. That's a lot of
website usage friction that could be caused by a mistake!
Thoughts/opinions?
- Abhishek
--
--
Chromium Discussion mailing list: chromium-***@chromium.org
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-discuss+***@chromium.org.
--
Chromium Discussion mailing list: chromium-***@chromium.org
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to chromium-discuss+***@chromium.org.